SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Revision tips…
Apr 23rd, 2007 by notebooker

As my students are now entering that end of year revision period we’ve been doing a lot of tutorials and revision classes.  These are always interesting as often the students seem to talk more and be willing to communicate what they know at this point because the onus shifts to them nedding to do so…I can only encourage them to do this more during the year – the more you articulate your own understanding of ideas verbally and in communication with others the easier it becomes to write student essays in situations like exams as your fluency with the arguments improves.

Anyway, aside from the core of all revision (get to know the material indside out!!) there are a couple of tips I’d offer:

1) The psychological anchor – lock some phrase, formula or quote into your memory.  Do this repetitively during the time you are revising and really learn it off by heart so you can recall it at any time.  This anchor will then be the tip of the iceberg, easily brought to mind and when you bring it to mind it will help connect you to the revision work your consciousness has taken in and filed somewhere you’re not sure of deep in your brain.  Think of it literally like an anchor – it provides a key to access the material you’ve taken in through activating a psychological connection.  It also enbales you to write something down when you get into the exam rather than encounter than dread silence of the mind when faced with the blank paper – instead of worrying about what to do, write down the anchor and then begin making a list of the various points that will come to mind, after which you can assemble them into the order in which they will be approached.

2) Use keywords and phrases (ie: intentionality, the a posteriori argument from design etc) – then ask – what does this mean, what does it do, how does it work.  Expklain these things when you introduce a concept and you will find things almost come naturally.

3) When writing and in the middle of a paragraph or line of argument a stray thought pops into mind, one that you know is relevant but which isn’t immediately relevant, write it down on a piece of paper to the side of the essay you’re workign on, then leave it alone and return to what you were writing.  Finish off the line of thought you were on and then look at the notes you jotted down and ask yourself how do I fit this in, what do I need to do to get to it?  This will stop the essays flitting about and enable you to write a coherent piece rather than meerely spewing up as much as you can as fast as you can – remember, the argument is the star, coherent essays with 6 main points are better than incoherent essays with 6 points.  Fluency and coherence are more than simple stylistic features, they form the points of knowledge into an inferential pattern with power and force rather than a set of random thoughts.

That will do for now – good luck in your exams all!

MA Deleuze workshop
Apr 16th, 2007 by notebooker

(This is for my MA class…not a public event I’m afraid ;-)

Hi all and I hope your essay work is going well and you’ve enjoyed the easter break.

This is to confirm the details of the Workshop we will be having this Friday.

MA Deleuze class Workshop
FRIDAY 20TH APRIL
2pm-8pm, KW202

KW202 is formally called a ‘drama studio’ (so that might be appropriate) and is up the stairs to the second floor, turn right and it’s at the end of the corridor.

I’ll bring some coffee and biscuits and we’ll have a break of half an hour about 5/5.30.

The idea is for you to 20 minute presentations, followed by ten minutes or so of discussion. These things will no doubt be flexible and if you only have a short presentation do still come and do it – the space to present the ideas and talk them out / through is very useful. If you can bring at least two copies of your text then I can take a copy away give you some extra feedback over the weekend. Remember I am away from the 25th to May 1st and the deadline is the 30th April, so this will be your last chance to get direct feedback either in person or in email form.

Powered by ScribeFire.

The phenomenological reduction (notes for students)
Apr 10th, 2007 by notebooker

The natural attitude contains within it an ability to move, a ‘natural mobility’, and this mobility is going to become the basis for the ‘reduction’ that is the central methodological core of phenomenology. Husserl says: “I can shift my standpoint in space and time, look this way and that, turn temporally forwards and backwards: I can provide for myself constantly new and more or less clear and meaningful perceptions and representations, and images also more or less clear, in which I make intuitable to myself whatever can possibly exist really or supposedly in the steadfast order of space and time” (Ideas: S27 p103).
Read the rest of this entry »

Book Tag Bibliomancy
Apr 1st, 2007 by notebooker

Rules:
1. Grab the nearest book.
2. Open the book to page 123.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the text of the next 4 sentences on your blog (or in the comments here) along with these instructions, if appropriate.
5. Tag five people.

————————

“The uniformity of the radiation is ‘a fossilized testament to the uniformity of both the laws of physics and the details of the environment across the cosmos’, and it is this homogeneity which, suggests Greene, makes it possible to meaningfully speak of a ‘universal synchrony’: ‘if the universe did not have symmetry in space – if, for example, the background radiation were thoroughly haphazard, having wildly different temperatures in different regions – time in a cosmological sense would have little meaning(FN5 – Brian Green, The Fabric of the Cosmos, Penguin 2004, 227-8).

RT: Yes, in fact the CMBR itself could be used by our so-moving observer to define a cosmic clock, obtained by measuring the uniform temperature of the microwave radiation and monitoring it as it cools down with the cosmic expansion. But even in the extreme case where you had a cosmological expansion that proceeded differentially in different directions, a so-called ‘anisotrophic universe’, instead of describing the expansion with just one number – redshift – then you would have one number for each direction. You could then possibly conceive of having different dimensions evolving differently with time.”

(Collapse, Vol 2, p123-4)

Powered by ScribeFire.

SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa